Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0269305, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36355851

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Adequate intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) uptake (≥3 doses) routinely delivered at antenatal clinics is effective in preventing malaria during pregnancy. Whereas, low IPTp uptake (24.0%) had been reported among pregnant women in Ebonyi State, there is paucity of studies comparing the uptake and its predictors in the urban and rural areas of Ebonyi State. We determined IPTp uptake and its predictors in the urban and rural areas of Ebonyi State. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional comparative study among 864 reproductive age women selected using multistage sampling. Using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire, we collected data on respondent's socio-demographic characteristics and IPTp uptake. Uptake was adjudged adequate if ≥3 doses were taken, otherwise inadequate. We estimated the proportion of women with adequate IPTp uptake and determined the factors associated with adequate uptake in rural and urban areas using chi square and multiple logistic regression at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: The mean ages of respondents in the urban and rural areas were 28.5±4.6 and 27.4±5.0 years respectively. Adequate IPTp uptake was 82.5% and 60.8% in the urban and rural respectively (p<0.001). In the urban area, women whose husbands had attained ≥ secondary education (aOR:2.9; 95%CI:1.2-7.4; p = 0.02) and those who paid for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamime (aOR:0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.6; p = 0.01) were 2.9 times more likely and 5 times less likely to take adequate IPTp respectively compared to respondents whose husbands had attained ≤ primary education and those who had sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine free. In the rural area, women who had attended ANC <4 times (aOR:0.4; 95%CI: 0.3-0.7; p<0.001) were 2.5 times less likely to take adequate IPTp compared to women that had attended ANC ≥4 times. CONCLUSION: Uptake of IPTp was more in the urban than rural areas of Ebonyi State. Interventions that reinforce the importance of health professionals carrying out actions aimed at pregnant women and their partners (spousal) in order to guide them on preventive actions against malaria and other diseases are recommended in Ebonyi State.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Adult , Sulfadoxine/therapeutic use , Pregnant Women , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/prevention & control , Nigeria , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prenatal Care , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control , Malaria/drug therapy , Drug Combinations
2.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 7(9): 859-866, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30316234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malaria accounts for 60% of outpatient visits in Nigeria. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of malaria and its treatment practices in Enugu state, Nigeria. METHODS: Qualitative data was collected through the use of focus group discussions (FGDs), from six villages three each from urban and rural areas of Enugu state, Nigeria. A total of 18 FGDs involving 189 participants were conducted and data on place of treatment for malaria and drug of choice for malaria treatment were collected. RESULTS: Most discussants had a good knowledge of the signs and symptoms of malaria. They reported late for treatment when they had symptoms suggestive of malaria. Treatment timing was affected by financial capability and perceived severity of disease. There was preference for patent medicine dealers (PMDs) and pharmacies for malaria treatment. The reasons included drug affordability, obtaining preferred drug, short waiting time and polite treatment from the providers. Treatment in most cases was without proper malaria diagnosis. Cost was an important factor in determining the drug of choice for malaria treatment. This could explain why people were not aware of the use of artemisininbased combination therapy while preferring mono-therapies and herbal drugs. Public hospitals were considered as good sources of treatment for malaria although they remain the last resort when treatment from these drug outlets failed. CONCLUSION: The community members preferred PMDs and pharmacies for malaria treatment. Unfortunately, these drug outlets do not encourage the use of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). This makes it necessary that pharmacists and PMDs are trained on management of malaria. Also, improving the knowledge of the public on the need for malaria diagnosis before treatment and use of artemisinin-based combination therapy will improve the control of malaria. The populace should be instructed to seek treatment early while also discouraging the use of herbal drugs for malaria treatment. There is also the need to improve service delivery at public health facilities.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Malaria/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Malaria/drug therapy , Nigeria , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Qualitative Research , Residence Characteristics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...